The closed-end funds Hannover is the selection process of the summary prospectus-check leasing growth values Europe 5. The Fund is designed as investor-oriented. The summary prospectus check demands high investment levels, low soft costs, and a solid use of the liquidity reserve. Furthermore, funds characterized by a mostly positive performance record and a serious initiators occurrence with a positive rating. Only about 15 percent of the audited funds receive brochure check a positive conclusion.

The closed-end funds Hannover leasing growth values Europe 5 has gone through the conclusion of brochure-check positive and is thus available at conclusion GmbH in Altusried im Allgau for investors. Hans-Peter Walter Kugler Managing Director sees the advantages of Hannover leasing funds especially in the outstanding figures of the Fund and in the realistic forecasting and return scenario. The conclusion-brochure-check to the Hannover leasing growth values Europe 5 is available as a pdf download and youtube video on. Hans-Peter Walter Kugler filters with the conclusion Prospectus-check white”closed-end funds in the grey capital market. Since the formal BFin prescribed since 2005 provide no security seal, is testing the commercial viability and plausibility of funds via an intermediary for Walter Kugler of central importance. The summary prospectus-check provides therefore figures for the level of investment, the soft costs and to use the liquidity reserve, as well as a subjective assessment by Walter Kugler. We do not select funds according to the highest Commission.

We do exactly the opposite.” Recommended for the brochure check judgment conclusion”a closed-end Fund must have an investment level of at least 85 percent. Walter Kugler does not check Fund below 80 percent. The summary prospectus check represents the interests of the investor when determining participation in the foreground. To the person: the conclusion of investment brokerage and asset management operates in the entire financial services sector. Sabine Walter Kugler is a competent contact person for retirement, insurance and Financing. Hans-Peter Walter Kugler is a competent contact for open and closed investment funds. He analyzed and selling closed-end funds for twenty years. Twelve years he worked at a major German bank. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Eva Andersson-Dubin, New York City. 1997 Walter Kugler has been independent financial advisers. He writes articles about closed-end funds (e.g. for performance, investment, real estate newspaper and euros on Sunday here with warnings in 2001 to fund by Falk and DBVI) since 1999.

Is the same as your trading in two forms of investment? Martin Rothe: The logic of the Tradingansatzes is independent of the vehicle. Risk and liquidity management are designed more as a percentage to fixed assets. Thus, the strategy is scalable. Who uses Exchange-traded and supervised futures contracts, must note the two limits: firstly, an appropriate balance of risk requires a minimum number of different markets and hence a minimum volume of account (with 300,000 managed accounts) and secondly, the supervisory authority restricted certain futures volumes per administrator. These limits but have billions of assets to the course. Between these two account sizes, our strategy is unlimited and equivalent can be implemented. Where do you see advantages of one or the other investment vehicle? What disadvantages are there? Martin Rothe: Both vehicles have immense benefits that should be weighed individually for investors. A managed account requires a personal agreement with the Thus, the investor retains investors, 100% control over his assets.

He can retrieve daily its stock and the positions and limited access the administrator only on transactions, but not on money movements. Furthermore the leverage, and thus the individual risk-taking can be set in a managed account with the administrator. At our Fund vehicles, lower investment to engage (100,000 or 10,000 at a Swiss private bank) stands out as a significant advantage. The typically higher investment volume in the Fund allows a finer diversification of positions, which is however in the long run does not necessarily yield relevant. In the institutional environment a fund is often regulatory and technical balance of advantage and an external administration allows an independent administrator review. The latter is objectively comprehensible also in a managed account due to the listing of the instruments of an investor and will be completed by the broker. As a disadvantage for the Fund can be something lead to higher cost structure and the fact that the positions are published only once a week with a fixed risk / return profile.